"This book offers by far the most serious, intellectually grounded strategy for system-changing yet to appear. It could be the most important movement-building book of the new century..."
—Daniel Ellsberg, author of Secrets: A Memoir of Vietnam and the Pentagon Papers
"Concrete and feasible ways to reverse the ominous course of the past several decades and to open the way to a vibrant democracy with a sustainable economy… A marvelous book…I recommend it all the time"
"Highly readable; excellent for students…. A tonic and eye-opener for anyone who wants a politics that works."
—Jane Mansbridge, President-Elect, American Political Science Association, Adams Professor, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University
Order from Amazon »
"This book opens an extraordinary new vista on the moral bankruptcy of our second Gilded Age."
- We need a new economic system
- It’s Time to Get Serious About Systemic Solutions to Systemic Problems
- Inequality’s Dead End—And the Possibility of a New, Long-Term Direction
- These Cities Built Cheap, Fast, Community-Owned Broadband. Here’s What Net Neutrality Means For Them—and All of Us
- New York Police Slowdown and the Classic Challenges of Alternatives to Capitalism
- A guaranteed income for veterans
- Playing the Long Game
- Pessimism about climate change does not justify inaction
- The Contours of Long-Term Systemic Crisis
- Forging a Transformative Vision
- Gar Alperovitz on The Laura Flanders Show
- David Harvey and Gar Alperovitz on Cooperation and Capitalism
- Is economic stagnation the new normal?
- Envisioning Where We Want to Go: An Interview With Evolutionary Reconstructionist Gar Alperovitz
- Is Worker Ownership a Way Forward for Market Basket?
- America Has a Scary Sewage Problem: Let’s Clean It Up and Jumpstart the Economy While We’re At It
- The Cooperative Economy: A Conversation with Gar Alperovitz
- Growth for growth’s sake will kill us all: Moral and ecological truths are challenging economic doctrines
- In conversation with Michael Albert
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- December 2010
- June 2010
- April 2010
- February 2010
- August 2009
- March 2009
- November 2008
- November 2007
- April 2007
- February 2007
- April 2006
- January 2006
- November 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- February 2005
- January 2000
- September 1995
- April 1991
Get in touch
Sign up for updates
A SYSTEMIC ALTERNATIVE
What Then Can I Do? Ten Ways to Democratize the Economy
How do we build a more democratic, equal and ecologically sustainable society? What can one person do?
Follow Me on Facebook and Twitter
Basic Principles for A New Direction
Originally published in the Los Angeles Times on September 4, 2014.
The concept of “secular stagnation” — that the economy may be facing a protracted period of low growth and high unemployment — has been seeping back into economic and policy discourse. Once relegated to the margins of heterodox economic theory, the idea of stagnation as a likely ongoing direction for the economy, in fact, is now virtually mainstream, expounded by such well-known figures as Lawrence Summers and Paul Krugman.
Major economic floundering in the first quarter of the 20th century was relieved by the boost World War I gave to the economy, and the tremendous economic collapse in the second quarter was ended by World War II’s huge increase in military spending. In the third quarter, the Korean War, the Cold War and the Vietnam War added major stimulus at key times.
Originally published on Truthout on August 22, 2014. Interview by Leslie Thatcher.
Longtime activist, historian and political-economic theorist Gar Alperovitz, whoseAmerica Beyond Capitalism was serialized on Truthout, conducted an email interview with us on the occasion of the creation of his new website.
Leslie Thatcher for Truthout: Gar, you’ve just created a new website that seems both to sum up the principles of your work on democratic ownership and on building a sustainable and equitable political-economic system and to track your personal trajectory as an activist and thinker over the last 50 years: What are your goals in establishing the website?
Gar Alperovitz: As you know, the Democracy Collaborative does a great deal of direct hands-on work helping establish worker-cooperatives and other efforts aimed at democratizing the ownership of wealth at different levels. The impetus for the website came from one of our lead researchers, Thomas Hanna, who suggested it might be useful to pull together some of the work I had been doing over the past several decades on the theory that informs much of our strategy.
From the late 1960s on, it seemed to me that a serious movement would ultimately have to go beyond simply urging “elements” of the next system (as for instance, simply promoting worker-owned firms, necessary as this is). It will have to begin to develop a clear and explicit larger vision and some quite specific ideas about why the “institutional design and architecture” of that vision would produce results better than the two traditional models – corporate capitalism, on the one hand, and state-socialism, on the other.
The primary goal of the website is to offer some explicit hand-holds (as I see them) for activists and theorists on how we might get serious about what a “next system” might really look like, and why, precisely, it would be better than the traditional models – and better, too, than some of the models that are commonly discussed in rhetorical terms without adequate attention to some of their well-known failings.
Put another way, the goal is to contribute to the discussion that is fast becoming critical: “If you don’t like capitalism and you don’t like traditional socialism, what do you want, and why – specifically, not rhetorically, would it be better?”
We’ve covered this before, but I’d be so grateful if you’d explain what you mean by and how you developed the term, “Pluralist Commonwealth.”
Briefly, I use this term to suggest that a serious next system must be built on the principle of plural forms of common wealth ownership – hence “pluralist commonwealth.” Basically, I’ve been trying to help move the dialogue beyond the oversimplified left debate that poses the only alternatives as either state socialism or worker-owned or worker-self-managed socialism. I think the next system will be much more interesting and complex in its structure – and should be! Especially, if we want to build a genuine democratic community-nurturing system from the ground up.
Originally published on Truthout.
The Market Basket situation is indeed, as many commentators have remarked, nearly unprecedented in the annals of American labor relations: When have we ever seen so many workers protest so vigorously for, rather than against, their boss! (For those new to the story, the New England supermarket chain has been wracked by massive employee protests, organized without any union involvement, after a faction of the family that owns the chain took control and ousted extremely popular CEO Arthur T. Demoulas. The mobilization in support of the former chief executive has resulted in nearly empty shelves and the mobilization of angry communities of formerly happy customers.)
But beneath the surface of the singular job action, in which workers and community have banded together to demand the reinstatement of the former CEO, the conflict in New England points toward something much more fundamental: the need to build institutions that can sustain the kind of community- and worker-friendly business leadership that earned “good brother” Arthur T. such incredible loyalty.